<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photos of sunsets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doof.me.uk/2009/09/18/photos-of-sunsets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doof.me.uk/2009/09/18/photos-of-sunsets/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=photos-of-sunsets</link>
	<description>Lalalala doo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:09:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blodgett</title>
		<link>http://www.doof.me.uk/2009/09/18/photos-of-sunsets/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>blodgett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doof.me.uk/?p=601#comment-1136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; My camera seems to have a choice of “spot”, “centre-weighted” and
&gt; “multi” (which it’s currently set to)

yah yah yah yah yarrr
these are usual suspects for focus options

think it was centre-weighted for the picture posted. or at least so says exif :p]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; My camera seems to have a choice of “spot”, “centre-weighted” and<br />
&gt; “multi” (which it’s currently set to)</p>
<p>yah yah yah yah yarrr<br />
these are usual suspects for focus options</p>
<p>think it was centre-weighted for the picture posted. or at least so says exif :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.doof.me.uk/2009/09/18/photos-of-sunsets/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doof.me.uk/?p=601#comment-1135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, will try these. My camera seems to have a choice of &quot;spot&quot;, &quot;centre-weighted&quot; and &quot;multi&quot; (which it&#039;s currently set to)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, will try these. My camera seems to have a choice of &#8220;spot&#8221;, &#8220;centre-weighted&#8221; and &#8220;multi&#8221; (which it&#8217;s currently set to)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blodgett</title>
		<link>http://www.doof.me.uk/2009/09/18/photos-of-sunsets/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>blodgett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doof.me.uk/?p=601#comment-1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[also, switching focus mode from centre-weighted to spot will make it more sensitive to light-levels at focus point, rather than trying to keep whole image in brightness range]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, switching focus mode from centre-weighted to spot will make it more sensitive to light-levels at focus point, rather than trying to keep whole image in brightness range</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blodgett</title>
		<link>http://www.doof.me.uk/2009/09/18/photos-of-sunsets/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>blodgett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doof.me.uk/?p=601#comment-1133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sunsets tricky. high ISO -&gt; nasty pictures. would suggest using ISO 400 max.
will probably need longer exposure, but usually worth it in quality difference.

things to maybe experiment with: lowering exposure a bit (e.g. set EV -0.3 or 0.6), and flicking through white balance settings. can get some fun colours playing with white balance :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sunsets tricky. high ISO -&gt; nasty pictures. would suggest using ISO 400 max.<br />
will probably need longer exposure, but usually worth it in quality difference.</p>
<p>things to maybe experiment with: lowering exposure a bit (e.g. set EV -0.3 or 0.6), and flicking through white balance settings. can get some fun colours playing with white balance <img src='http://www.doof.me.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
